This Activist Life

“not sure when you last spoke to [x] or how much she told you about all the common ground drama, but it’s pretty chaotic here, and not in a good way.  [a founder] and the fiscal sponsor turned over all directing responsibility of cg to brandon darby, and, well, let’s just say that any lingering notion that common ground is a collective has been completely shattered.  darby might be anti-racist, but he’s got a lot to learn as far as male privilege is concerned.  there are days when i feel like i’d rather be back working in a formal Catholic institution b/c at least I’d know to expect the blatant sexism and hierarchy.  if it wasn’t for all the other amazing folks struggling alongside me with the day to day work i’d be long gone.”
– from an email sent 10 Feb 07

This weekend the public radio show This American Life is going to do a story on Brandon Darby, an activist who became an informant for the FBI.  I’m very curious to hear how the story gets told, but they probably won’t tell the side of the story I’m most familiar with.  I worked with Darby in 2007, when both of us were part of Common Ground, an organization doing relief work in post-Katrina New Orleans.  As the above excerpt from a personal email I sent shows, I have a definite bias, based on my less than positive interactions with him.  But my experiences with Darby have also given me a lot to think about when it comes to how we as activists work together, how we hold one another accountable, and how we go about not making the same mistakes as the culture we’re critiquing.

When the rumors of Darby’s involvement with the FBI were confirmed, there was a lot of speculation about when exactly he began informing.  Was it just in the months before the 2008 Republican National Convention protests, or did it go back further?  Was he working for the feds when he was in New Orleans?  It might sound ridiculous and paranoid to consider this, but it’s not hard to see how many came to that conclusion.  Common Ground was political as well as social service oriented, formed in large part to counter the ineffective relief efforts attempted by FEMA and other government agencies.  Common Ground routinely criticized government officials (often via an active grassroots media team), it refused any federal funds, and one of its founders was a former Black Panther, an organization that itself saw a great deal of harmful (and deadly) government infiltration throughout its history.  Common Ground at that point in time fit the profile of an organization that would likely be under some sort of surveillance.

Then there was Darby’s sometimes erratic behavior and seemingly inexplicable actions that would make more sense if understood as being done to deliberately sabotage the organization.  Like ousting two long-term workers simply because they publicly disagreed with him in a meeting.  Or, in a burst of anger, canceling the cell phone account used as the central hotline for the hugely successful (and much needed) legal aid program; or the matter of thousands of dollars wasted on an ill-conceived and poorly planned “police accountability” project that went nowhere.  Most harmful of all was the loss of many allies in organizations throughout the city who were alienated by Darby’s arrogant bravado and no longer wanted to work with the organization.

All of this said, I think dwelling on the was-he or wasn’t-he questions of when his involvement with the FBI began detracted from the bigger and more difficult questions and issues that we anti-oppression activists need to be focused on.  There will always be government interference with our work, and much of that is beyond our control.

The biggest problem I have with Brandon Darby isn’t that he snitched.  What still angers me to this day is how his unchecked sexism, authoritarian leadership style, and stubborn refusal to take advice or criticism caused a great deal of disruption to the organization’s relief and justice work in New Orleans.  The fact that someone with so much unexamined privilege was able to maintain leadership in our organization as long as he did says a lot about us as well: we as activists have to do a better job of calling out oppressive behavior within our organizing culture.  It means being truly democratic in how we structure ourselves, and being clear that top-down power imbalances are not effective, even if done with supposedly good intentions.  It means being willing to have difficult conversations when it’s not convenient, when there’s “not enough time” because we have so much “real” work to do.  It means continuing to do our own internal anti-oppression work, especially when it comes to examining the intersection of differing oppressions, and being willing to take constructive criticism.

Common Ground was right to be explicitly anti-racist in its work, but that wasn’t enough.  By failing to critically examine and confront other oppressions at work in our organization (such as sexism, ageism, authoritarianism), we allowed highly dysfunctional behavior to go unchecked, which ultimately lessened our ability to do effective work for the people of New Orleans.  Sadly, Darby was not the only one at fault when it comes this lack of critical reflection, and I think this festering of multiple “isms” within the group laid the groundwork for someone as problematic as him to be placed in such an influential position.

Could we have done things differently?  Many people in Common Ground had problems with Darby’s actions from the outset, but it was also made clear from early on that disagreement with him would not be tolerated (such as the examples mentioned above).  Some long term workers decided to leave the organization rather than continue to work under him.  Many of us chose instead to try to work around him, avoiding interactions and further fruitless arguments we felt we could not win with him.  When it was necessary to deal with Darby or one of his (all male) team, I often sent a male co-worker, knowing that he could successfully navigate Darby’s good ol’ boys network.  I chose the “easy” way of avoiding conflict by retreating into traditionally female roles: running the office behind the scenes and even (literally) getting coffee for the men when they came by for meetings.

I rationalized my experiences by telling myself that what I was dealing with was minimal compared to what the residents of New Orleans were going through, and my issues needed to take a back seat.  But the stress of working in such a dysfunctional setting took its toll on me, and I think I was a less effective relief worker in the long run because of that stress.  I’m convinced that many others experienced a similar type of burnout.

If we had dealt more effectively with Darby in New Orleans, would he have been in less of a position of prominence when he returned to Texas, and therefore less able to influence the younger activists who became caught in the web of government surveillance and entrapment?  It’s hard to say for sure, and probably not a productive line of reasoning.  What I do know is that we will always be dealing with people like Brandon Darby, and while we are right to be angry about what he did, it can’t detract us from the essential anti-oppression work we each have to do.  In the case of Common Ground, making Darby the scapegoat for all that went wrong lets the rest of us off the hook, and distracts us from continuing to ask the hard questions of how each of us is also complicit in oppressive actions.

I’m guessing that if I didn’t have a personal tie to the story, the upcoming episode of This American Life would be, as usual, good radio entertainment.  But I have a feeling I’ll instead find myself muttering epithets back at the radio when I hear Darby once again try to portray himself as nothing more than an earnest, ethical activist who couldn’t bear the thought of violence happening, and so he took it upon himself to Do The Right Thing and become an informant.  I’ll think back to the behavior I witnessed in New Orleans and wish he’d never been given the mike.  Then I hope to turn off the radio and get back to work.



Filed under Activism, current events, New Orleans

7 responses to “This Activist Life

  1. thanks V.

    I think you are right on target with this.

  2. glad you’re standin’ up, makin’ a statement. (i’ve sent you an email as well). thanks for being here.

  3. JessSnark

    I’m here from the Feministe blogaround.

    Wow- interesting to read this. I heard most of the interview (missed the beginning) but had never heard of Darby beforehand. He sounded like a difficult person to work with in general, but I didn’t hear specifics (e.g. anything about sexism) in the interview. Thanks for writing this.

  4. victoria

    Thanks, everyone for your replies.

    @ Jess, part of why i wrote this in the first place was that i had a feeling his sexism, etc wasn’t going to be addressed. which then leads to a mistaken assumption that folks are pissed at Darby just b/c of his working with the fbi, when, for a lot of us, that was just one more thing to add to the list of problems we had with him.

  5. Thanks for this, Victoria. I never knew the guy, though his voice sounded very familiar. The TAM program doesn’t deal with sexism directly, but it does really drive home the point that this was a super-macho dude who put a lot of effort into challenging the masculinity of younger activists to push them to take more risks. It’s really amazing to me how this is blatantly discussed, but was not enough to totally discredit him in court as an informer. Of course, it’s standard behavior for an agent provocateur, a technique with over 150 years of history. What I found bizarre is how he openly admitted that he did so, with the twisted logic that he was trying to get the guys NOT to do dangerous actions.

    That is the most disingenuous bullshit I’ve ever heard out of anyone’s mouth. Anyone, literally anyone could tell you that if a tough, trusted, older macho guy tells a younger, smaller guy that he’s a wimp if he doesn’t do X, he’s MORE likely to do it, not less.

    The smidgen of sympathy I felt for Darby before was totally gone once I heard him trip over himself to justify this bullying.

    I totally agree that the more important issue isn’t the fact that Darby was a rat– it’s the toleration of this kind of behavior by people in the movement. And the blame here falls mostly on men: women and transgendered activists call this stuff out all the time. I’d be curious to hear Mr. Malik Rahim’s thoughts on this topic. I don’t mean to make Rahim into the villain– he’s a real hero to the movement on so many levels and I have tons of respect for his life and work– but I do think it would be worthwhile for him and others to take to heart the critique you’ve laid out, so that in the future this kind of bully, even a brave, charismatic, highly skilled one, can’t rise to that level of unaccountable leadership and power– whether he’s an informant or not.

  6. Pingback: changing the world « (hasta la) Victoria

  7. Pingback: Brandon Darby in New Orleans : FBI Informant Was Egotistical Sexist | The Rag Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s