Another reason to love Minnesota: it’s a place where a former football player can become a state supreme court justice and issue a decision in favor of the election of a former comedian as U.S. senator.
June 18, 2009
leaving home
“As you enter a house, wish it peace. If the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it; if not, let your peace return to you. Whoever will not receive you or listen to your words–go outside that house or town and shake the dust from your feet.” (Matt 10:12-14)
I don’t know who first observed that the Catholic Church has many of the characteristics of a dysfunctional family. I just know that I really identify with the analogy.
June 10, 2009
trolls are funny
Dealing with online trolls is probably the least fun part of contributing to blogs and message boards. My favorite strategy is what the writers at Feministe do with their many sexist trolls: they hold a regular contest called the “Feministe’s Next Top Troll” (a la ‘America’s Next Top Model’) and let the readers vote on who is the most obnoxious troll. Yes, the mockery is a bit silly and childish, but I think it’s a fabulous way to diffuse the power of the hateful words the contributors have to put up with on a regular basis.
There’s a new contest running now, so check it out and join in the voting (the comment sections can also be quite funny and well worth checking out).
May 31, 2009
Substitute “Birmingham” with “Witchita”
a bullet came to visit a doctor
in his one safe place
I think this song is in a lot of heads right now:
May 28, 2009
preventing more homelessness in NOLA
An action alert from the Katrina Information Network. Click the link to contact FEMA and other government officials.
(btw, I want to note that not all folks in New Orleans are OK with the term “refugee” to describe survivors of Katrina. But I respect the work that KIN does and support their goals)
|
May 21, 2009
This Activist Life
“not sure when you last spoke to [x] or how much she told you about all the common ground drama, but it’s pretty chaotic here, and not in a good way. [a founder] and the fiscal sponsor turned over all directing responsibility of cg to brandon darby, and, well, let’s just say that any lingering notion that common ground is a collective has been completely shattered. darby might be anti-racist, but he’s got a lot to learn as far as male privilege is concerned. there are days when i feel like i’d rather be back working in a formal Catholic institution b/c at least I’d know to expect the blatant sexism and hierarchy. if it wasn’t for all the other amazing folks struggling alongside me with the day to day work i’d be long gone.”
- from an email sent 10 Feb 07
This weekend the public radio show This American Life is going to do a story on Brandon Darby, an activist who became an informant for the FBI. I’m very curious to hear how the story gets told, but they probably won’t tell the side of the story I’m most familiar with. I worked with Darby in 2007, when both of us were part of Common Ground, an organization doing relief work in post-Katrina New Orleans. As the above excerpt from a personal email I sent shows, I have a definite bias, based on my less than positive interactions with him. But my experiences with Darby have also given me a lot to think about when it comes to how we as activists work together, how we hold one another accountable, and how we go about not making the same mistakes as the culture we’re critiquing.
When the rumors of Darby’s involvement with the FBI were confirmed, there was a lot of speculation about when exactly he began informing. Was it just in the months before the 2008 Republican National Convention protests, or did it go back further? Was he working for the feds when he was in New Orleans? It might sound ridiculous and paranoid to consider this, but it’s not hard to see how many came to that conclusion. Common Ground was political as well as social service oriented, formed in large part to counter the ineffective relief efforts attempted by FEMA and other government agencies. Common Ground routinely criticized government officials (often via an active grassroots media team), it refused any federal funds, and one of its founders was a former Black Panther, an organization that itself saw a great deal of harmful (and deadly) government infiltration throughout its history. Common Ground at that point in time fit the profile of an organization that would likely be under some sort of surveillance.
Then there was Darby’s sometimes erratic behavior and seemingly inexplicable actions that would make more sense if understood as being done to deliberately sabotage the organization. Like ousting two long-term workers simply because they publicly disagreed with him in a meeting. Or, in a burst of anger, canceling the cell phone account used as the central hotline for the hugely successful (and much needed) legal aid program; or the matter of thousands of dollars wasted on an ill-conceived and poorly planned “police accountability” project that went nowhere. Most harmful of all was the loss of many allies in organizations throughout the city who were alienated by Darby’s arrogant bravado and no longer wanted to work with the organization.
All of this said, I think dwelling on the was-he or wasn’t-he questions of when his involvement with the FBI began detracted from the bigger and more difficult questions and issues that we anti-oppression activists need to be focused on. There will always be government interference with our work, and much of that is beyond our control.
The biggest problem I have with Brandon Darby isn’t that he snitched. What still angers me to this day is how his unchecked sexism, authoritarian leadership style, and stubborn refusal to take advice or criticism caused a great deal of disruption to the organization’s relief and justice work in New Orleans. The fact that someone with so much unexamined privilege was able to maintain leadership in our organization as long as he did says a lot about us as well: we as activists have to do a better job of calling out oppressive behavior within our organizing culture. It means being truly democratic in how we structure ourselves, and being clear that top-down power imbalances are not effective, even if done with supposedly good intentions. It means being willing to have difficult conversations when it’s not convenient, when there’s “not enough time” because we have so much “real” work to do. It means continuing to do our own internal anti-oppression work, especially when it comes to examining the intersection of differing oppressions, and being willing to take constructive criticism.
Common Ground was right to be explicitly anti-racist in its work, but that wasn’t enough. By failing to critically examine and confront other oppressions at work in our organization (such as sexism, ageism, authoritarianism), we allowed highly dysfunctional behavior to go unchecked, which ultimately lessened our ability to do effective work for the people of New Orleans. Sadly, Darby was not the only one at fault when it comes this lack of critical reflection, and I think this festering of multiple “isms” within the group laid the groundwork for someone as problematic as him to be placed in such an influential position.
Could we have done things differently? Many people in Common Ground had problems with Darby’s actions from the outset, but it was also made clear from early on that disagreement with him would not be tolerated (such as the examples mentioned above). Some long term workers decided to leave the organization rather than continue to work under him. Many of us chose instead to try to work around him, avoiding interactions and further fruitless arguments we felt we could not win with him. When it was necessary to deal with Darby or one of his (all male) team, I often sent a male co-worker, knowing that he could successfully navigate Darby’s good ol’ boys network. I chose the “easy” way of avoiding conflict by retreating into traditionally female roles: running the office behind the scenes and even (literally) getting coffee for the men when they came by for meetings.
I rationalized my experiences by telling myself that what I was dealing with was minimal compared to what the residents of New Orleans were going through, and my issues needed to take a back seat. But the stress of working in such a dysfunctional setting took its toll on me, and I think I was a less effective relief worker in the long run because of that stress. I’m convinced that many others experienced a similar type of burnout.
If we had dealt more effectively with Darby in New Orleans, would he have been in less of a position of prominence when he returned to Texas, and therefore less able to influence the younger activists who became caught in the web of government surveillance and entrapment? It’s hard to say for sure, and probably not a productive line of reasoning. What I do know is that we will always be dealing with people like Brandon Darby, and while we are right to be angry about what he did, it can’t detract us from the essential anti-oppression work we each have to do. In the case of Common Ground, making Darby the scapegoat for all that went wrong lets the rest of us off the hook, and distracts us from continuing to ask the hard questions of how each of us is also complicit in oppressive actions.
I’m guessing that if I didn’t have a personal tie to the story, the upcoming episode of This American Life would be, as usual, good radio entertainment. But I have a feeling I’ll instead find myself muttering epithets back at the radio when I hear Darby once again try to portray himself as nothing more than an earnest, ethical activist who couldn’t bear the thought of violence happening, and so he took it upon himself to Do The Right Thing and become an informant. I’ll think back to the behavior I witnessed in New Orleans and wish he’d never been given the mike. Then I hope to turn off the radio and get back to work.
May 17, 2009
because “every” Catholic is blogging about it
There’s a lot I could comment on regarding the manufactured “controversy” of Obama speaking at Notre Dame, but I don’t think I’m ready to delve into that particular swamp. I’m also reluctant to focus too much attention on something that ought to be a non-issue on the spectrum of Things To Be Morally Outraged About.
So instead I’ll link to commentary posted at The National Catholic Reporter by Vincent Miller, which has some good insights on the Notre Dame issue and the “abortionification” of Catholicism in the U.S.
Certainly there are serious differences on abortion rights, but there is much for a Catholic University to support and honor. But, once again, all other dimensions of Catholic concern are eclipsed by the sole focus on abortion.
The affair at the gates of Notre Dame illuminates a great threat posed to the Church as the bishops become increasingly identified with extreme groups in the public eye.…Outspoken bishops have described Obama’s election as “apocalyptic,” his invitation to Notre Dame is described as an “embarrassment,” another thundered “We are at war!”
May 5, 2009
Variation on Matthew 25
“The Gospel takes away our right, forever, to discriminate between the deserving and the undeserving poor.” – Dorothy Day
“When The Beloved One comes in glory, and all the angels with The Beloved, all the nations will be assembled before the Beloved, who will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
The Beloved will place the sheep on the right and the goats on the left.
Then The Beloved will say to those on the right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by The Most High. Inherit the kin-dom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.’
Then the righteous will answer and say, ‘Beloved, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?
When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you?
When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?’
And The Beloved will say to them in reply, ‘Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers or sisters of mine, you did for me.’
Then The Beloved will say to those on the left, ‘Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and the devil’s angels.
For I was hungry and you asked for pay stubs to prove that I was poor enough to be given free food,
I was thirsty and you ran my social security number to ensure I wasn’t scamming the system,
a stranger and you asked to see my green card and visa status before taking further action,
naked and you said it was my fault because I was lazy and should try harder,
ill and you told me only people with health insurance are treated at your clinic,
in prison and you assumed I deserved to rot there because only criminals end up in jail.
Then they will answer and say, ‘Beloved, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’
The Beloved will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’”
May 1, 2009
Thank an anarchist
If you’re a worker in the U.S. who is guaranteed a maximum 8 hour work day, thank an anarchist. Thanks in part to a group of anarchists in Chicago during the 1880s, you have the right to work no more than 8 hours a day. It’s something a lot of us now take for granted, but it wasn’t too long ago that bosses could demand 10, 12, even 16 hour days from their employees, and overtime was unheard of.
The next time you hear anarchists stereotyped as violent young troublemakers, remember that there were anarchists who risked and lost their lives so that you could have the right to better working conditions at your job.
click the link below to read the full story
|
April 17, 2009
teargas canister = bullet
The same kind of high-velocity missile-shaped tear gas canister that was used to shoot my friend Tristan was used to kill a 29 year old Palestinian demonstrator.
Once again the Israeli military will issue a statement claiming that it will “investigate the incident,” and once again a soldier who shot an unarmed civilian will go unpunished for using a crowd dispersal device as a gun.
(Tristan remains in critical condition, and the full extent of his head injuries are still unknown.)
|
